On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 06:10:52PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 11:09:18AM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote: > > > > is there any way we could have d_path functionality (even > > reduced and not working for all cases) that could be used > > or called like that? > > I agree with Al. This helper cannot be enabled for all of bpf tracing. > We have to white list its usage for specific callsites only. > May be all of lsm hooks are safe. I don't know yet. This has to be > analyzed carefully. Every hook. One by one. > in_task() isn't really a solution. ok, I thought of white list and it seemed too much to me, but there's probably no other way jirka > > At the same time I agree that such helper is badly needed. > Folks have been requesting it for long time. >
