On 3/23/2020 9:44 AM, KP Singh wrote:
> From: KP Singh <kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The bpf_lsm_ nops are initialized into the LSM framework like any other
> LSM. Some LSM hooks do not have 0 as their default return value. The
> __weak symbol for these hooks is overridden by a corresponding
> definition in security/bpf/hooks.c
>
> The LSM can be enabled / disabled with CONFIG_LSM.
>
> Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Florent Revest <revest@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> security/Kconfig | 10 ++++----
> security/Makefile | 2 ++
> security/bpf/Makefile | 5 ++++
> security/bpf/hooks.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 security/bpf/Makefile
> create mode 100644 security/bpf/hooks.c
>
> diff --git a/security/Kconfig b/security/Kconfig
> index 2a1a2d396228..cd3cc7da3a55 100644
> --- a/security/Kconfig
> +++ b/security/Kconfig
> @@ -277,11 +277,11 @@ endchoice
>
> config LSM
> string "Ordered list of enabled LSMs"
> - default "lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity,smack,selinux,tomoyo,apparmor" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_SMACK
> - default "lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity,apparmor,selinux,smack,tomoyo" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_APPARMOR
> - default "lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity,tomoyo" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_TOMOYO
> - default "lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_DAC
> - default "lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity,selinux,smack,tomoyo,apparmor"
> + default "lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity,smack,selinux,tomoyo,apparmor,bpf" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_SMACK
> + default "lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity,apparmor,selinux,smack,tomoyo,bpf" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_APPARMOR
> + default "lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity,tomoyo,bpf" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_TOMOYO
> + default "lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity,bpf" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_DAC
> + default "lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity,selinux,smack,tomoyo,apparmor,bpf"
> help
> A comma-separated list of LSMs, in initialization order.
> Any LSMs left off this list will be ignored. This can be
> diff --git a/security/Makefile b/security/Makefile
> index 746438499029..22e73a3482bd 100644
> --- a/security/Makefile
> +++ b/security/Makefile
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ subdir-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_YAMA) += yama
> subdir-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_LOADPIN) += loadpin
> subdir-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_SAFESETID) += safesetid
> subdir-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_LOCKDOWN_LSM) += lockdown
> +subdir-$(CONFIG_BPF_LSM) += bpf
>
> # always enable default capabilities
> obj-y += commoncap.o
> @@ -30,6 +31,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_LOADPIN) += loadpin/
> obj-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_SAFESETID) += safesetid/
> obj-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_LOCKDOWN_LSM) += lockdown/
> obj-$(CONFIG_CGROUP_DEVICE) += device_cgroup.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_LSM) += bpf/
>
> # Object integrity file lists
> subdir-$(CONFIG_INTEGRITY) += integrity
> diff --git a/security/bpf/Makefile b/security/bpf/Makefile
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..c7a89a962084
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/security/bpf/Makefile
> @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +#
> +# Copyright (C) 2020 Google LLC.
> +
> +obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_LSM) := hooks.o
> diff --git a/security/bpf/hooks.c b/security/bpf/hooks.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..68e5824868f9
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/security/bpf/hooks.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2020 Google LLC.
> + */
> +#include <linux/lsm_hooks.h>
> +#include <linux/bpf_lsm.h>
> +
> +/* Some LSM hooks do not have 0 as their default return values. Override the
> + * __weak definitons generated by default for these hooks
> + */
> +noinline int bpf_lsm_inode_getsecurity(struct inode *inode, const char *name,
> + void **buffer, bool alloc)
> +{
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +}
> +
> +noinline int bpf_lsm_inode_setsecurity(struct inode *inode, const char *name,
> + const void *value, size_t size,
> + int flags)
> +{
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +}
> +
> +noinline int bpf_lsm_task_prctl(int option, unsigned long arg2,
> + unsigned long arg3, unsigned long arg4,
> + unsigned long arg5)
> +{
> + return -ENOSYS;
> +}
> +
> +noinline int bpf_lsm_xfrm_state_pol_flow_match(struct xfrm_state *x,
> + struct xfrm_policy *xp,
> + const struct flowi *fl)
> +{
> + return 1;
> +}
> +
> +static struct security_hook_list bpf_lsm_hooks[] __lsm_ro_after_init = {
> + #define LSM_HOOK(RET, NAME, ...) LSM_HOOK_INIT(NAME, bpf_lsm_##NAME),
> + #include <linux/lsm_hook_names.h>
> + #undef LSM_HOOK
> +};
> +
> +static int __init bpf_lsm_init(void)
> +{
> + security_add_hooks(bpf_lsm_hooks, ARRAY_SIZE(bpf_lsm_hooks), "bpf");
> + pr_info("LSM support for eBPF active\n");
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +DEFINE_LSM(bpf) = {
> + .name = "bpf",
> + .init = bpf_lsm_init,
Have you given up on the "BPF must be last" requirement?
> +};
