Currently, some samples are using ioctl for enabling perf_event and attaching BPF programs to this event. However, the bpf_program__attach of libbpf(using bpf_link) is much more intuitive than the previous method using ioctl. bpf_program__attach_perf_event manages the enable of perf_event and attach of BPF programs to it, so there's no neeed to do this directly with ioctl. In addition, bpf_link provides consistency in the use of API because it allows disable (detach, destroy) for multiple events to be treated as one bpf_link__destroy. To refactor samples with using this libbpf API, the bpf_load in the samples were removed and migrated to libbbpf. Because read_trace_pipe is used in bpf_load, multiple samples cannot be migrated to libbpf, this function was moved to trace_helpers. Changes in v2: - check memory allocation is successful - clean up allocated memory on error Changes in v3: - Improve pointer error check (IS_ERR()) - change to calloc for easier destroy of bpf_link - remove perf_event fd list since bpf_link handles fd - use newer bpf_object__{open/load} API instead of bpf_prog_load - perf_event for _SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN instead of _SC_NPROCESSORS_CONF - sample specific chagnes... Changes in v4: - bpf_link *, bpf_object * set NULL on init & err for easier destroy - close bpf object with bpf_object__close() Changes in v5: - on error, return error code with exit Daniel T. Lee (2): samples: bpf: move read_trace_pipe to trace_helpers samples: bpf: refactor perf_event user program with libbpf bpf_link samples/bpf/Makefile | 8 +- samples/bpf/bpf_load.c | 20 --- samples/bpf/bpf_load.h | 1 - samples/bpf/sampleip_user.c | 98 +++++++++----- samples/bpf/trace_event_user.c | 139 +++++++++++++------- samples/bpf/tracex1_user.c | 1 + samples/bpf/tracex5_user.c | 1 + tools/testing/selftests/bpf/trace_helpers.c | 23 ++++ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/trace_helpers.h | 1 + 9 files changed, 187 insertions(+), 105 deletions(-) -- 2.25.1