Re: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Fix spurious failures in accept due to EAGAIN

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 05:42:36PM +0100, Jakub Sitnicki wrote:
> 
> What if we extended test_progs runner to support process-per-test
> execution model? Perhaps as an opt-in for selected tests.

I would love that.
Especially if fork-per-test can make majority of the tests to execute in
parallel. Running test_progs is the biggest time sync for me when I apply
patches. Running them in parallel will help me apply patches faster, so I can
dedicate more time to reviews :)



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux