On 3/4/20 4:47 PM, KP Singh wrote:
From: KP Singh <kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxx>
As we need to introduce a third type of attachment for trampolines, the
flattened signature of arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline gets even more
complicated.
Refactor the prog and count argument to arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline to
use bpf_tramp_progs to simplify the addition and accounting for new
attachment types.
Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@xxxxxx>
[...]
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
index c498f0fffb40..9f7e0328a644 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
@@ -320,6 +320,7 @@ static int bpf_struct_ops_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
struct bpf_struct_ops_value *uvalue, *kvalue;
const struct btf_member *member;
const struct btf_type *t = st_ops->type;
+ struct bpf_tramp_progs *tprogs = NULL;
void *udata, *kdata;
int prog_fd, err = 0;
void *image;
@@ -425,10 +426,18 @@ static int bpf_struct_ops_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
goto reset_unlock;
}
+ tprogs = kcalloc(BPF_TRAMP_MAX, sizeof(*tprogs), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!tprogs) {
+ err = -ENOMEM;
+ goto reset_unlock;
+ }
+
Looking over the code again, I'm quite certain that here's a memleak
since the kcalloc() is done in the for_each_member() loop in the ops
update but then going out of scope and in the exit path we only kfree
the last tprogs.
+ tprogs[BPF_TRAMP_FENTRY].progs[0] = prog;
+ tprogs[BPF_TRAMP_FENTRY].nr_progs = 1;
err = arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(image,
st_map->image + PAGE_SIZE,
&st_ops->func_models[i], 0,
- &prog, 1, NULL, 0, NULL);
+ tprogs, NULL);
if (err < 0)
goto reset_unlock;
@@ -469,6 +478,7 @@ static int bpf_struct_ops_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
memset(uvalue, 0, map->value_size);
memset(kvalue, 0, map->value_size);
unlock:
+ kfree(tprogs);
mutex_unlock(&st_map->lock);
return err;
}
