Re: [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: relax check whether BTF is mandatory

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 10:27 PM Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> If BPF program is using BTF-defined maps, BTF is required only for
> libbpf itself to process map definitions. If after that BTF fails to
> be loaded into kernel (e.g., if it doesn't support BTF at all), this
> shouldn't prevent valid BPF program from loading. Existing
> retry-without-BTF logic for creating maps will succeed to create such
> maps without any problems. So, presence of .maps section shouldn't make
> BTF required for kernel. Update the check accordingly.
>
> Validated by ensuring simple BPF program with BTF-defined maps is still
> loaded on old kernel without BTF support and map is correctly parsed and
> created.
>
> Fixes: abd29c931459 ("libbpf: allow specifying map definitions using BTF")
> Reported-by: Julia Kartseva <hex@xxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@xxxxxx>

Applied. Thanks



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux