Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: make btf_check_func_type_match() static

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: make btf_check_func_type_match() static
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 00:39:45 +0100
Cc: chenzhou10@xxxxxxxxxx, kafai@xxxxxx, songliubraving@xxxxxx, yhs@xxxxxx, andriin@xxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, clang-built-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20200210011441.147102-1-yaohongbo@huawei.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2

On 2/10/20 2:14 AM, Hongbo Yao wrote:

Fix sparse warning:
kernel/bpf/btf.c:4131:5: warning: symbol 'btf_check_func_type_match' was
not declared. Should it be static?

Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Hongbo Yao <yaohongbo@xxxxxxxxxx>


Given this fixes a warning, applied to bpf.

References:
- [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: make btf_check_func_type_match() static
  - From: Hongbo Yao

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH bpf 3/3] selftests/bpf: Test freeing sockmap/sockhash with a socket in it
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 02/10] bpf: lsm: Add a skeleton and config options
Previous by thread: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: make btf_check_func_type_match() static
Next by thread: [PATCH] bpf: selftests build error in sockmap_basic.c
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Samsung SoC] [Linux Rockchip SoC] [Linux Actions SoC] [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux