[PATCH -next] bpf: make btf_check_func_type_match() static

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Fix sparse warning:
kernel/bpf/btf.c:4131:5: warning: symbol 'btf_check_func_type_match' was
not declared. Should it be static?

Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Hongbo Yao <yaohongbo@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/bpf/btf.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
index 8c9d8f266bef..83d3d92023af 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
@@ -4144,7 +4144,7 @@ int btf_distill_func_proto(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
  * EFAULT - verifier bug
  * 0 - 99% match. The last 1% is validated by the verifier.
  */
-int btf_check_func_type_match(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
+static int btf_check_func_type_match(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
 			      struct btf *btf1, const struct btf_type *t1,
 			      struct btf *btf2, const struct btf_type *t2)
 {
-- 
2.20.1




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux