On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 04:51:53PM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote: > Hello, > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 09:19:22PM +0000, Quentin Monnet wrote: > > 2025-03-17 10:16 UTC-0700 ~ Ian Rogers <irogers@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 10:06 AM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> > > >> Hello, > > >> > > >> On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 09:10:29AM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote: > > >>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 7:45 AM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo > > >>> <acme@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> We have a tools/build/feature/test-all.c that has the most common set of > > >>>> features that perf uses and are expected to have its development files > > >>>> available when building perf. > > >>>> > > >>>> When we made libwunwind opt-in we forgot to remove them from the list of > > >>>> features that are assumed to be available when test-all.c builds, remove > > >>>> them. > > >>>> > > >>>> Before this patch: > > >>>> > > >>>> $ rm -rf /tmp/b ; mkdir /tmp/b ; make -C tools/perf O=/tmp/b feature-dump ; grep feature-libunwind-aarch64= /tmp/b/FEATURE-DUMP > > >>>> feature-libunwind-aarch64=1 > > >>>> $ > > >>>> > > >>>> Even tho this not being test built and those header files being > > >>>> available: > > >>>> > > >>>> $ head -5 tools/build/feature/test-libunwind-aarch64.c > > >>>> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > >>>> #include <libunwind-aarch64.h> > > >>>> #include <stdlib.h> > > >>>> > > >>>> extern int UNW_OBJ(dwarf_search_unwind_table) (unw_addr_space_t as, > > >>>> $ > > >>>> > > >>>> After this patch: > > >>>> > > >>>> $ grep feature-libunwind- /tmp/b/FEATURE-DUMP > > >>>> $ > > >>>> > > >>>> Now an audit on what is being enabled when test-all.c builds will be > > >>>> performed. > > >>>> > > >>>> Fixes: 176c9d1e6a06f2fa ("tools features: Don't check for libunwind devel files by default") > > >>>> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx> > > >>>> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@xxxxxxxxxx> > > >>>> Cc: James Clark <james.clark@xxxxxxxxxx> > > >>>> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx> > > >>>> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > >>>> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx> > > >>>> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx> > > >>> > > >>> Sorry for the delay on this. > > >>> > > >>> Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@xxxxxxxxxx> > > >> > > >> Thanks for the review, but I think this part is used by other tools like > > >> BPF and tracing. It'd be nice to get reviews from them. > > > > > > Sgtm. The patch hasn't had attention for 3 months. A quick grep for > > > "unwind" and "UNW_" shows only use in perf and the feature tests. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Ian > > > > > > Indeed, bpftool does not rely on libunwind, and I don't remember other > > BPF components doing so, either. > > Right, but my concern was about the feature test itself and the related > changes in the build files. > > Can I get your Acked-by then? hi, I might be missing something, but I see following commit in git already: b40fbeb0b1cd tools build: Remove the libunwind feature tests from the ones detected when test-all.o builds jirka