On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 10:22:55AM +0100, Vyavahare, Tushar wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Fijalkowski, Maciej <maciej.fijalkowski@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2025 3:41 AM
> > To: Vyavahare, Tushar <tushar.vyavahare@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; bjorn@xxxxxxxxxx; Karlsson,
> > Magnus <magnus.karlsson@xxxxxxxxx>; jonathan.lemon@xxxxxxxxx;
> > davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; kuba@xxxxxxxxxx; pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx;
> > ast@xxxxxxxxxx; daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Sarkar, Tirthendu
> > <tirthendu.sarkar@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/2] selftests/xsk: Add tail adjustment tests
> > and support check
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 02:18:13PM +0000, Tushar Vyavahare wrote:
> > > Introduce tail adjustment functionality in xskxceiver using
> > > bpf_xdp_adjust_tail(). Add `xsk_xdp_adjust_tail` to modify packet
> > > sizes and drop unmodified packets. Implement
> > > `is_adjust_tail_supported` to check helper availability. Develop
> > > packet resizing tests, including shrinking and growing scenarios, with
> > > functions for both single-buffer and multi-buffer cases. Update the
> > > test framework to handle various scenarios and adjust MTU settings.
> > > These changes enhance the testing of packet tail adjustments, improving
> > AF_XDP framework reliability.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Tushar Vyavahare <tushar.vyavahare@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > .../selftests/bpf/progs/xsk_xdp_progs.c | 49 ++++++++
> > > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xsk_xdp_common.h | 1 +
> > > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++-
> > > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.h | 2 +
> > > 4 files changed, 157 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > + return testapp_adjust_tail(test, adjust_value, len); }
> > > +
> > > +static int testapp_adjust_tail_shrink(struct test_spec *test) {
> > > + return testapp_adjust_tail_common(test, -4, MIN_PKT_SIZE, false); }
> > > +
> > > +static int testapp_adjust_tail_shrink_mb(struct test_spec *test) {
> > > + return testapp_adjust_tail_common(test, -4,
> > > +XSK_RING_PROD__DEFAULT_NUM_DESCS * 3, true);
> >
> > Am I reading this right that you are modifying the size by just 4 bytes?
> > The bugs that drivers had were for cases when packets got modified by value
> > bigger than frag size which caused for example underlying page being freed.
> >
> > If that is the case tests do nothing valuable from my perspective.
> >
>
> In the v4 patchset, I have updated the code to modify the packet size by
> 1024 bytes instead of just 4 bytes.
Why this value?
> I will send v4.
