Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4] bpf: Reject attaching fexit/fmod_ret to __noreturn functions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 4:20 AM Alexei Starovoitov
<alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 5:18 AM Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > If we attach fexit/fmod_ret to __noreturn functions, it will cause an
> > issue that the bpf trampoline image will be left over even if the bpf
> > link has been destroyed. Take attaching do_exit() with fexit for example.
> > The fexit works as follows,
> >
> >   bpf_trampoline
> >   + __bpf_tramp_enter
> >     + percpu_ref_get(&tr->pcref);
> >
> >   + call do_exit()
> >
> >   + __bpf_tramp_exit
> >     + percpu_ref_put(&tr->pcref);
> >
> > Since do_exit() never returns, the refcnt of the trampoline image is
> > never decremented, preventing it from being freed. That can be verified
> > with as follows,
> >
> >   $ bpftool link show                                   <<<< nothing output
> >   $ grep "bpf_trampoline_[0-9]" /proc/kallsyms
> >   ffffffffc04cb000 t bpf_trampoline_6442526459    [bpf] <<<< leftover
> >
> > In this patch, all functions annotated with __noreturn are rejected, except
> > for the following cases:
> > - Functions that result in a system reboot, such as panic,
> >   machine_real_restart and rust_begin_unwind
> > - Functions that are never executed by tasks, such as rest_init and
> >   cpu_startup_entry
> > - Functions implemented in assembly, such as rewind_stack_and_make_dead and
> >   xen_cpu_bringup_again, lack an associated BTF ID.
> >
> > With this change, attaching fexit probes to functions like do_exit() will
> > be rejected.
> >
> > $ ./fexit
> > libbpf: prog 'fexit': BPF program load failed: -EINVAL
> > libbpf: prog 'fexit': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG --
> > Attaching fexit/fmod_ret to __noreturn functions is rejected.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 48 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> > index 9971c03adfd5..b7d7d5c4989f 100644
> > --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> > +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> > @@ -22841,6 +22841,49 @@ BTF_ID(func, __rcu_read_unlock)
> >  #endif
> >  BTF_SET_END(btf_id_deny)
> >
> > +/* fexit and fmod_ret can't be used to attach to __noreturn functions.
> > + * Currently, we must manually list all __noreturn functions here. Once a more
> > + * robust solution is implemented, this workaround can be removed.
> > + */
> > +BTF_SET_START(noreturn_deny)
> > +#define NORETURN(fn) BTF_ID(func, fn)
>
> no need for extra macro. Just use BTF_ID(...) below.
>
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION
> > +NORETURN(__ia32_sys_exit)
> > +NORETURN(__ia32_sys_exit_group)
> > +#endif
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_KUNIT
> > +NORETURN(__kunit_abort)
> > +NORETURN(kunit_try_catch_throw)
> > +#endif
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
> > +NORETURN(__module_put_and_kthread_exit)
> > +#endif
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> > +NORETURN(__x64_sys_exit)
> > +NORETURN(__x64_sys_exit_group)
> > +#endif
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_XEN_PV_SMP
> > +NORETURN(cpu_bringup_and_idle)
> > +#endif
>
> it's called during bringup. bpf doesn't exist at that time.
> Drop it.
>
> > +NORETURN(do_exit)
> > +NORETURN(do_group_exit)
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_X86) && defined(CONFIG_SMP)
> > +NORETURN(hlt_play_dead)
> > +#endif
>
> This one is similar to panic.
> Drop it.
>
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_HYPERV
> > +NORETURN(hv_ghcb_terminate)
> > +#endif
>
> Also does 'hlt'.
> Drop it.
>
> > +NORETURN(kthread_complete_and_exit)
> > +NORETURN(kthread_exit)
> > +NORETURN(make_task_dead)
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT
> > +NORETURN(sev_es_terminate)
> > +NORETURN(snp_abort)
>
> drop both for the same reason as above.
>
> > +#endif
> > +NORETURN(stop_this_cpu)
>
> and this one as well.
>
> Pls make sure to resend as series of 2 patches
> otherwise bpf CI will complain.

will change it.
Thanks for your review.

-- 
Regards
Yafang





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux