Re: [PATCH bpf-next v11 2/4] bpf: add bpf_cpu_time_counter_to_ns helper

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 3:50 PM Vadim Fedorenko <vadfed@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The new helper should be used to convert deltas of values
> received by bpf_get_cpu_time_counter() into nanoseconds. It is not
> designed to do full conversion of time counter values to
> CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW nanoseconds and cannot guarantee monotonicity of 2
> independent values, but rather to convert the difference of 2 close
> enough values of CPU timestamp counter into nanoseconds.
>
> This function is JITted into just several instructions and adds as
> low overhead as possible and perfectly suits benchmark use-cases.
>
> When the kfunc is not JITted it returns the value provided as argument
> because the kfunc in previous patch will return values in nanoseconds.
>
> Reviewed-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@xxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadfed@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c   | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  include/linux/bpf.h           |  1 +
>  kernel/bpf/helpers.c          |  6 ++++++
>  4 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> index 92cd5945d630..3e4d45defe2f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>  #include <linux/filter.h>
>  #include <linux/if_vlan.h>
>  #include <linux/bpf.h>
> +#include <linux/clocksource.h>
>  #include <linux/memory.h>
>  #include <linux/sort.h>
>  #include <asm/extable.h>
> @@ -2289,6 +2290,30 @@ st:                      if (is_imm8(insn->off))
>                                 break;
>                         }
>
> +                       if (insn->src_reg == BPF_PSEUDO_KFUNC_CALL &&
> +                           IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL) &&
> +                           imm32 == BPF_CALL_IMM(bpf_cpu_time_counter_to_ns) &&
> +                           cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_TSC) &&
> +                           using_native_sched_clock() && sched_clock_stable()) {

And now this condition copy pasted 3 times ?!

> +                               struct cyc2ns_data data;
> +                               u32 mult, shift;
> +
> +                               cyc2ns_read_begin(&data);
> +                               mult = data.cyc2ns_mul;
> +                               shift = data.cyc2ns_shift;
> +                               cyc2ns_read_end();

This needs a big comment explaining why this math will be stable
after JIT and for the lifetime of the prog.

> +                               /* imul RAX, RDI, mult */
> +                               maybe_emit_mod(&prog, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, true);
> +                               EMIT2_off32(0x69, add_2reg(0xC0, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
> +                                           mult);
> +
> +                               /* shr RAX, shift (which is less than 64) */
> +                               maybe_emit_1mod(&prog, BPF_REG_0, true);
> +                               EMIT3(0xC1, add_1reg(0xE8, BPF_REG_0), shift);
> +
> +                               break;
> +                       }
> +
>                         func = (u8 *) __bpf_call_base + imm32;
>                         if (src_reg == BPF_PSEUDO_CALL && tail_call_reachable) {
>                                 LOAD_TAIL_CALL_CNT_PTR(stack_depth);
> @@ -3906,7 +3931,8 @@ bool bpf_jit_inlines_kfunc_call(s32 imm)
>  {
>         if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL))
>                 return false;
> -       if (imm == BPF_CALL_IMM(bpf_get_cpu_time_counter) &&
> +       if ((imm == BPF_CALL_IMM(bpf_get_cpu_time_counter) ||
> +           imm == BPF_CALL_IMM(bpf_cpu_time_counter_to_ns)) &&
>             cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_TSC) &&
>             using_native_sched_clock() && sched_clock_stable())
>                 return true;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
> index 7f13509c66db..9791a3fb9d69 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
>  #include <linux/netdevice.h>
>  #include <linux/filter.h>
>  #include <linux/if_vlan.h>
> +#include <linux/clocksource.h>
>  #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
>  #include <asm/set_memory.h>
>  #include <asm/nospec-branch.h>
> @@ -2115,6 +2116,29 @@ static int do_jit(struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog, int *addrs, u8 *image,
>                                         EMIT2(0x0F, 0x31);
>                                         break;
>                                 }
> +                               if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL) &&
> +                                   imm32 == BPF_CALL_IMM(bpf_cpu_time_counter_to_ns) &&
> +                                   cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_TSC) &&
> +                                   using_native_sched_clock() && sched_clock_stable()) {
> +                                       struct cyc2ns_data data;
> +                                       u32 mult, shift;
> +
> +                                       cyc2ns_read_begin(&data);
> +                                       mult = data.cyc2ns_mul;
> +                                       shift = data.cyc2ns_shift;
> +                                       cyc2ns_read_end();

same here.

> +
> +                                       /* move parameter to BPF_REG_0 */
> +                                       emit_ia32_mov_r64(true, bpf2ia32[BPF_REG_0],
> +                                                         bpf2ia32[BPF_REG_1], true, true,
> +                                                         &prog, bpf_prog->aux);
> +                                       /* multiply parameter by mut */
> +                                       emit_ia32_mul_i64(bpf2ia32[BPF_REG_0],
> +                                                         mult, true, &prog);

How did you test this?
It's far from obvious that this will match what mul_u64_u32_shr() does.
And on a quick look I really doubt.

The trouble of adding support for 32-bit JIT doesn't seem worth it.

> +                                       /* shift parameter by shift which is less than 64 */
> +                                       emit_ia32_rsh_i64(bpf2ia32[BPF_REG_0],
> +                                                         shift, true, &prog);
> +                               }
>
>                                 err = emit_kfunc_call(bpf_prog,
>                                                       image + addrs[i],
> @@ -2648,7 +2672,8 @@ bool bpf_jit_inlines_kfunc_call(s32 imm)
>  {
>         if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL))
>                 return false;
> -       if (imm == BPF_CALL_IMM(bpf_get_cpu_time_counter) &&
> +       if ((imm == BPF_CALL_IMM(bpf_get_cpu_time_counter) ||
> +           imm == BPF_CALL_IMM(bpf_cpu_time_counter_to_ns)) &&
>             cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_TSC) &&
>             using_native_sched_clock() && sched_clock_stable())
>                 return true;
> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
> index a5e9b592d3e8..f45a704f06e3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -3389,6 +3389,7 @@ u64 bpf_get_raw_cpu_id(u64 r1, u64 r2, u64 r3, u64 r4, u64 r5);
>
>  /* Inlined kfuncs */
>  u64 bpf_get_cpu_time_counter(void);
> +u64 bpf_cpu_time_counter_to_ns(u64 counter);
>
>  #if defined(CONFIG_NET)
>  bool bpf_sock_common_is_valid_access(int off, int size,
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
> index 43bf35a15f78..e5ed5ba4b4aa 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
> @@ -3198,6 +3198,11 @@ __bpf_kfunc u64 bpf_get_cpu_time_counter(void)
>         return ktime_get_raw_fast_ns();
>  }
>
> +__bpf_kfunc u64 bpf_cpu_time_counter_to_ns(u64 counter)
> +{
> +       return counter;
> +}
> +
>  __bpf_kfunc_end_defs();
>
>  BTF_KFUNCS_START(generic_btf_ids)
> @@ -3299,6 +3304,7 @@ BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_kmem_cache_destroy, KF_ITER_DESTROY | KF_SLEEPABLE)
>  BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_local_irq_save)
>  BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_local_irq_restore)
>  BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_get_cpu_time_counter, KF_FASTCALL)
> +BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_cpu_time_counter_to_ns, KF_FASTCALL)
>  BTF_KFUNCS_END(common_btf_ids)
>
>  static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set common_kfunc_set = {
> --
> 2.47.1
>





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux