Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1] selftests/bpf: Fix arena_spin_lock compilation on PowerPC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/03/25 9:13 pm, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi wrote:
On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 at 16:42, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Venkat reported a compilation error for BPF selftests on PowerPC [0].
The crux of the error is the following message:
   In file included from progs/arena_spin_lock.c:7:
   /root/bpf-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_arena_spin_lock.h:122:8:
   error: member reference base type '__attribute__((address_space(1)))
   u32' (aka '__attribute__((address_space(1))) unsigned int') is not a
   structure or union
      122 |         old = atomic_read(&lock->val);

This is because PowerPC overrides the qspinlock type changing the
lock->val member's type from atomic_t to u32.

To remedy this, import the asm-generic version in the arena spin lock
header, name it __qspinlock (since it's aliased to arena_spinlock_t, the
actual name hardly matters), and adjust the selftest to not depend on
the type in vmlinux.h.

   [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/7bc80a3b-d708-4735-aa3b-6a8c21720f9d@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Fixes: 0201027a026c ("selftests/bpf: Introduce arena spin lock")
Reported-by: Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@xxxxxxxxx>
---

Built the kernel by applying this patch on bpf-next. And selftests/bpf compiles successfully.

Please add below tag.


Tested-by: Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Venkat, please help test, as CI and I don't have access to a PowerPC machine.

Thanks!




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux