On 11. 03. 25, 10:46, Jiri Slaby wrote:
On 10. 03. 25, 18:04, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
6.13-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me
know.
------------------
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 4346ba1604093305a287e08eb465a9c15ba05b80 ]
...
--- a/kernel/trace/Kconfig
+++ b/kernel/trace/Kconfig
@@ -302,11 +302,9 @@ config DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS
config FPROBE
bool "Kernel Function Probe (fprobe)"
- depends on FUNCTION_TRACER
- depends on DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS || DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS
- depends on HAVE_FTRACE_REGS_HAVING_PT_REGS || !
HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS
- depends on HAVE_RETHOOK
- select RETHOOK
+ depends on HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_FREGS && HAVE_FTRACE_GRAPH_FUNC
HAVE_FTRACE_GRAPH_FUNC does not exist on 6.13, so FPROBE is effectively
disabled by this backport.
Is this missing (and only this?):
commit a762e9267dca843ced943ec24f20e110ba7c8431
Author: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu Dec 26 14:13:34 2024 +0900
ftrace: Add CONFIG_HAVE_FTRACE_GRAPH_FUNC
With this applied, x86_64 is fixed. But ppc and s390 still loose it.
On the top of that, arm64 can indeed have FPROBEs now (the aim of the
patches).
thanks,
--
js
suse labs
