On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 08:58:27AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 07:54:34PM +0100, Andrea Righi wrote: > > Just to make sure I understand, you mean provide two separate kfuncs: > > scx_bpf_select_cpu_and() and scx_bpf_select_cpu_pref(), instead of > > introducing the flag? > > Oh I meant just having scx_bpf_select_cpu_and(). The caller can just call it > twice for _pref() behavior, right? Oh I see, you call it for the pref CPUs first and then for all the CPUs to get the same behavior (similar to what we do with the SMT idle cores). Yeah, that can work. Good idea! Thanks, -Andrea
