[no subject]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Just to make it clear... there is a patch 18:
> 
>  F: kernel/bpf/
>  F: kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
>  F: lib/buildid.c
> +F: arch/*/include/asm/rqspinlock.h
> +F: include/asm-generic/rqspinlock.h
> +F: kernel/locking/rqspinlock.c
>  F: lib/test_bpf.c
>  F: net/bpf/
> 
> that adds maintainer entries to BPF scope.
> 
> We're not asking locking experts to maintain this new res_spin_lock.
> It's not a generic kernel infra.
> It will only be used by bpf infra and by bpf progs.
> We will maintain it and we will fix whatever bugs
> we introduce.

While that is appreciated, the whole kernel is subject to the worst case
behaviour of this thing. As such, I feel I need to care.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux