On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 06:51:41PM +0800, Menglong Dong wrote: > On Mon, Mar 3, 2025 at 5:18 PM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 02:53:42PM +0800, Menglong Dong wrote: > > > index c71b575bf229..ad050d09cb2b 100644 > > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c > > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c > > > @@ -908,7 +908,7 @@ void __init_or_module noinline apply_seal_endbr(s32 *start, s32 *end, struct mod > > > > > > poison_endbr(addr, wr_addr, true); > > > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FINEIBT)) > > > - poison_cfi(addr - 16, wr_addr - 16); > > > + poison_cfi(addr, wr_addr); > > > } > > > } > > > > If you're touching this code, please use tip/x86/core or tip/master. > > Thank you for reminding me that, I were using the linux-next, and That must've been an very old -next, because that wr_addr crap has been gone a while now. Anyway, thanks for moving to a newer tree!
