On Fri, 2025-02-28 at 08:28 -0800, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi wrote: > Add tests for rejecting sleepable and accepting non-sleepable global > function calls in atomic contexts. For spin locks, we still reject > all global function calls. Once resilient spin locks land, we will > carefully lift in cases where we deem it safe. > > Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@xxxxxxxxx> > --- Maybe add one more layer in some of the tests? E.g. call non-sleepable global from sleepable global and vice-versa? [...]
