On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 10:30 AM -08, Cong Wang wrote:
> From: Cong Wang <cong.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> psock->eval can only have 4 possible values, make it 8-bit is
> sufficient.
>
> psock->redir_ingress is just a boolean, using 1 bit is enough.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <cong.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/linux/skmsg.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/skmsg.h b/include/linux/skmsg.h
> index bf28ce9b5fdb..beaf79b2b68b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/skmsg.h
> +++ b/include/linux/skmsg.h
> @@ -85,8 +85,8 @@ struct sk_psock {
> struct sock *sk_redir;
> u32 apply_bytes;
> u32 cork_bytes;
> - u32 eval;
> - bool redir_ingress; /* undefined if sk_redir is null */
> + unsigned int eval : 8;
> + unsigned int redir_ingress : 1; /* undefined if sk_redir is null */
> struct sk_msg *cork;
> struct sk_psock_progs progs;
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BPF_STREAM_PARSER)
Are you doing this bit packing to create a hole big enough to fit
another u32 introduced in the next patch?
