On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 9:03 AM Tao Chen <chen.dylane@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Kprobe prog type kfuncs like bpf_session_is_return and > bpf_session_cookie will check the expected_attach_type, > so init the expected_attach_type here. > > Signed-off-by: Tao Chen <chen.dylane@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_probes.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_probes.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_probes.c > index 8efebc18a215..bb5b457ddc80 100644 > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_probes.c > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_probes.c > @@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ static int probe_prog_load(enum bpf_prog_type prog_type, > break; > case BPF_PROG_TYPE_KPROBE: > opts.kern_version = get_kernel_version(); > + opts.expected_attach_type = BPF_TRACE_KPROBE_SESSION; so KPROBE_SESSION is relative recent feature, if we unconditionally specify this, we'll regress some feature probes for old kernels where KPROBE_SESSION isn't supported, no? pw-bot: cr > break; > case BPF_PROG_TYPE_LIRC_MODE2: > opts.expected_attach_type = BPF_LIRC_MODE2; > -- > 2.43.0 >