Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/3] bpf: add kfunc for skb refcounting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 2/20/2025 5:45 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
These have been mostly taken from Amery Hung's work related to bpf qdisc
implementation. bpf_skb_{acquire,release}() are for increment/decrement
sk_buff::users whereas bpf_skb_destroy() is called for map entries that
have not been released and map is being wiped out from system.

Signed-off-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  net/core/filter.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 62 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
index 2ec162dd83c4..9bd2701be088 100644
--- a/net/core/filter.c
+++ b/net/core/filter.c
@@ -12064,6 +12064,56 @@ __bpf_kfunc int bpf_sk_assign_tcp_reqsk(struct __sk_buff *s, struct sock *sk,
__bpf_kfunc_end_defs(); +__diag_push();
+__diag_ignore_all("-Wmissing-prototypes",
+		  "Global functions as their definitions will be in vmlinux BTF");
+
+/* bpf_skb_acquire - Acquire a reference to an skb. An skb acquired by this
+ * kfunc which is not stored in a map as a kptr, must be released by calling
+ * bpf_skb_release().
+ * @skb: The skb on which a reference is being acquired.
+ */
+__bpf_kfunc struct sk_buff *bpf_skb_acquire(struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	if (refcount_inc_not_zero(&skb->users))

Any reason to use refcount_inc_not_zero instead of refcount_inc here?

+		return skb;
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+/* bpf_skb_release - Release the reference acquired on an skb.
+ * @skb: The skb on which a reference is being released.
+ */
+__bpf_kfunc void bpf_skb_release(struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	skb_unref(skb);
+}
+
+/* bpf_skb_destroy - Release an skb reference acquired and exchanged into
+ * an allocated object or a map.
+ * @skb: The skb on which a reference is being released.
+ */
+__bpf_kfunc void bpf_skb_destroy(struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	(void)skb_unref(skb);
Actually, there might be a dtor that work for both cls and qdisc. This skb_unref() seems redundant, consume_skb() already unref once.

+	consume_skb(skb);

consume_skb() indicates that the skb is consumed, but if the skb here is being dropped by dtor. kfree_skb() or maybe kfree_skb_reason() with a proper reason should be better.

Here is the comments for consume_skb() in skbuff.c
* Functions identically to kfree_skb, but kfree_skb assumes that the frame
 *      is being dropped after a failure and notes that

So the dtor would be basically the same as the qdisc one.

+}
+
+__diag_pop();
+
+BTF_KFUNCS_START(skb_kfunc_btf_ids)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_skb_acquire, KF_ACQUIRE | KF_RET_NULL)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_skb_release, KF_RELEASE)
+BTF_KFUNCS_END(skb_kfunc_btf_ids)
+
+static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set skb_kfunc_set = {
+	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
+	.set   = &skb_kfunc_btf_ids,
+};
+
+BTF_ID_LIST(skb_kfunc_dtor_ids)
+BTF_ID(struct, sk_buff)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_skb_destroy, KF_RELEASE)
+
  int bpf_dynptr_from_skb_rdonly(struct __sk_buff *skb, u64 flags,
  			       struct bpf_dynptr *ptr__uninit)
  {
@@ -12117,6 +12167,13 @@ static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set bpf_kfunc_set_tcp_reqsk = {
static int __init bpf_kfunc_init(void)
  {
+	const struct btf_id_dtor_kfunc skb_kfunc_dtors[] = {
+		{
+			.btf_id       = skb_kfunc_dtor_ids[0],
+			.kfunc_btf_id = skb_kfunc_dtor_ids[1]
+		},
+	};
+
  	int ret;
ret = register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, &bpf_kfunc_set_skb);
@@ -12133,6 +12190,11 @@ static int __init bpf_kfunc_init(void)
  	ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, &bpf_kfunc_set_xdp);
  	ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK_ADDR,
  					       &bpf_kfunc_set_sock_addr);
+	ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, &skb_kfunc_set);
+
+	ret = ret ?: register_btf_id_dtor_kfuncs(skb_kfunc_dtors,
+						 ARRAY_SIZE(skb_kfunc_dtors),
+						 THIS_MODULE);
  	return ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, &bpf_kfunc_set_tcp_reqsk);
  }
  late_initcall(bpf_kfunc_init);





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux