Le 21/02/2025 à 02:36, Philo Lu a écrit :
> We found an issue when using bpf_redirect with ipvs NAT mode after
> commit ff70202b2d1a ("dev_forward_skb: do not scrub skb mark within
> the same name space"). Particularly, we use bpf_redirect to return
> the skb directly back to the netif it comes from, i.e., xnet is
> false in skb_scrub_packet(), and then ipvs_property is preserved
> and SNAT is skipped in the rx path.
>
> ipvs_property has been already cleared when netns is changed in
> commit 2b5ec1a5f973 ("netfilter/ipvs: clear ipvs_property flag when
> SKB net namespace changed"). This patch just clears it in spite of
> netns.
>
> Signed-off-by: Philo Lu <lulie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> This is in fact a fix patch, and the issue was found after commit
> ff70202b2d1a ("dev_forward_skb: do not scrub skb mark within
> the same name space"). But I'm not sure if a "Fixes" tag should be
> added to that commit.
> ---
> net/core/skbuff.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
> index 7b03b64fdcb2..b1c81687e9d8 100644
> --- a/net/core/skbuff.c
> +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
> @@ -6033,11 +6033,11 @@ void skb_scrub_packet(struct sk_buff *skb, bool xnet)
> skb->offload_fwd_mark = 0;
> skb->offload_l3_fwd_mark = 0;
> #endif
> + ipvs_reset(skb);
>
> if (!xnet)
> return;
>
> - ipvs_reset(skb);
I don't know IPVS, but I wonder if this patch will not introduce a regression
for other users. skb_scrub_packet() is used by a lot of tunnels, it's not
specific to bpf_redirect().
Regards,
Nicolas
