Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 2/2] selftests/bpf: Test struct_ops program with __ref arg calling bpf_tail_call

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 2/2] selftests/bpf: Test struct_ops program with __ref arg calling bpf_tail_call
From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 16:50:55 -0800
Cc: daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, andrii@xxxxxxxxxx, alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx, martin.lau@xxxxxxxxxx, kernel-team@xxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20250220221532.1079331-2-ameryhung@gmail.com>
User-agent: Evolution 3.54.3 (3.54.3-1.fc41)

On Thu, 2025-02-20 at 14:15 -0800, Amery Hung wrote:
> Test if the verifier rejects struct_ops program with __ref argument
> calling bpf_tail_call().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Amery Hung <ameryhung@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---

Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@xxxxxxxxx>

[...]

References:
- [PATCH bpf-next v1 1/2] bpf: Do not allow tail call in strcut_ops program with __ref argument
  - From: Amery Hung
- [PATCH bpf-next v1 2/2] selftests/bpf: Test struct_ops program with __ref arg calling bpf_tail_call
  - From: Amery Hung

Prev by Date: [PATCH] fix: out-of-bound read in libbpf.c
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 3/3] selftests/bpf: add tests for bpf_dynptr_copy
Previous by thread: [PATCH bpf-next v1 2/2] selftests/bpf: Test struct_ops program with __ref arg calling bpf_tail_call
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 1/2] bpf: Do not allow tail call in strcut_ops program with __ref argument
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Samsung SoC] [Linux Rockchip SoC] [Linux Actions SoC] [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux