Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next v1 1/2] bpf: Explore PTR_TO_STACK as R0 for bpf_dynptr_slice_rdwr

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2025-02-19 at 13:56 +0100, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi wrote:

[...]

> It also leads to veristat regression (+80-100% in states) in two selftests.
> 
> We probably want to avoid doing push_stack due to the states increase,
> and instead mark the stack slot instead whenever the returned
> PTR_TO_MEM is used for writing, but we'll have to keep remarking
> whenever writes happen, so it requires stashing some stack slot state
> in the register.
> The other option is invalidating the returned PTR_TO_MEM when the
> buffer on the stack is written to (i.e. the stack location gets
> reused).

Would it be wrong, to always consider r0 to be a pointer to stack if
buffer is provided? It's like modelling the PTR_TO_MEM with some
additional precision.

Otherwise, I think push_stack() is fine, as it keeps implementation simple.






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux