Re: [PATCH bpf-next v11 09/12] bpf: add BPF_SOCK_OPS_TS_ACK_OPT_CB callback

[Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 4:34 AM Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 2/13/25 5:00 PM, Jason Xing wrote:
> > diff --git a/net/dsa/user.c b/net/dsa/user.c
> > index 291ab1b4acc4..794fe553dd77 100644
> > --- a/net/dsa/user.c
> > +++ b/net/dsa/user.c
> > @@ -897,7 +897,7 @@ static void dsa_skb_tx_timestamp(struct dsa_user_priv *p,
> >   {
> >       struct dsa_switch *ds = p->dp->ds;
> >
> > -     if (!(skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_flags & SKBTX_HW_TSTAMP))
> > +     if (!(skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_flags & SKBTX_HW_TSTAMP_NOBPF))
>
> This change should be in patch 8.
>
> [ ... ]
>
> > diff --git a/net/socket.c b/net/socket.c
> > index 262a28b59c7f..517de433d4bb 100644
> > --- a/net/socket.c
> > +++ b/net/socket.c
> > @@ -676,7 +676,7 @@ void __sock_tx_timestamp(__u32 tsflags, __u8 *tx_flags)
> >       u8 flags = *tx_flags;
> >
> >       if (tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_HARDWARE) {
> > -             flags |= SKBTX_HW_TSTAMP;
> > +             flags |= SKBTX_HW_TSTAMP_NOBPF;
>
> Same here.

Sure, you're right. If you feel it's necessary to re-spin, I will
adjust these two points :)

Thanks,
Jason

>
>