Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 26/26] selftests/bpf: Add tests for rqspinlock

[Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 2025-02-06 at 02:54 -0800, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi wrote:

[...]

> +void test_res_spin_lock(void)
> +{
> +	if (test__start_subtest("res_spin_lock_success"))
> +		test_res_spin_lock_success();
> +	if (test__start_subtest("res_spin_lock_failure"))
> +		test_res_spin_lock_failure();
> +}

Such organization makes it impossible to select sub-tests from
res_spin_lock_failure using ./test_progs -t.
I suggest doing something like below:

	@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
	 #include "res_spin_lock.skel.h"
	 #include "res_spin_lock_fail.skel.h"

	-static void test_res_spin_lock_failure(void)
	+void test_res_spin_lock_failure(void)
	 {
	        RUN_TESTS(res_spin_lock_fail);
	 }
	@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ static void *spin_lock_thread(void *arg)
	        pthread_exit(arg);
	 }

	-static void test_res_spin_lock_success(void)
	+void test_res_spin_lock_success(void)
	 {
	        LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts,
	                .data_in = &pkt_v4,
	@@ -89,11 +89,3 @@ static void test_res_spin_lock_success(void)
	        res_spin_lock__destroy(skel);
	        return;
	 }
	-
	-void test_res_spin_lock(void)
	-{
	-       if (test__start_subtest("res_spin_lock_success"))
	-               test_res_spin_lock_success();
	-       if (test__start_subtest("res_spin_lock_failure"))
	-               test_res_spin_lock_failure();
	-}

[...]