[PATCH bpf-next 2/3] bpf: Reject attaching fexit to functions annotated with __noreturn

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



If we attach fexit to a function annotated with __noreturn, it will
cause an issue that the bpf trampoline image will be left over even if
the bpf link has been destroyed. Take attaching do_exit() for example. The
fexit works as follows,

  bpf_trampoline
  + __bpf_tramp_enter
    + percpu_ref_get(&tr->pcref);

  + call do_exit()

  + __bpf_tramp_exit
    + percpu_ref_put(&tr->pcref);

Since do_exit() never returns, the refcnt of the trampoline image is
never decremented, preventing it from being freed. This can be verified
with as follows,

  $ bpftool link show                                   <<<< nothing output
  $ grep "bpf_trampoline_[0-9]" /proc/kallsyms
  ffffffffc04cb000 t bpf_trampoline_6442526459    [bpf] <<<< leftover

With this change, attaching fexit probes to functions like do_exit() will
be rejected.

$ ./fexit
libbpf: prog 'fexit': BPF program load failed: -EINVAL
libbpf: prog 'fexit': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG --
processed 0 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states 0 peak_states 0 mark_read 0
-- END PROG LOAD LOG --
libbpf: prog 'fexit': failed to load: -EINVAL
libbpf: failed to load object 'fexit_bpf'
libbpf: failed to load BPF skeleton 'fexit_bpf': -EINVAL
failed to load BPF object -22

Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 9971c03adfd5..f7224fc61e0c 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -22841,6 +22841,13 @@ BTF_ID(func, __rcu_read_unlock)
 #endif
 BTF_SET_END(btf_id_deny)
 
+/* The functions annotated with __noreturn are denied. */
+BTF_SET_START(fexit_deny)
+#define NORETURN(fn) BTF_ID(func, fn)
+#include <linux/noreturns.h>
+#undef NORETURN
+BTF_SET_END(fexit_deny)
+
 static bool can_be_sleepable(struct bpf_prog *prog)
 {
 	if (prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING) {
@@ -22929,6 +22936,9 @@ static int check_attach_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 	} else if (prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING &&
 		   btf_id_set_contains(&btf_id_deny, btf_id)) {
 		return -EINVAL;
+	} else if (prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_TRACE_FEXIT &&
+		   btf_id_set_contains(&fexit_deny, btf_id)) {
+		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
 	key = bpf_trampoline_compute_key(tgt_prog, prog->aux->attach_btf, btf_id);
-- 
2.43.5





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux