Re: [PATCH net-next 1/4] unroll: add generic loop unroll helpers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 07:26:26PM +0100, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> There are cases when we need to explicitly unroll loops. For example,
> cache operations, filling DMA descriptors on very high speeds etc.
> Add compiler-specific attribute macros to give the compiler a hint
> that we'd like to unroll a loop.
> Example usage:
> 
>  #define UNROLL_BATCH 8
> 
> 	unrolled_count(UNROLL_BATCH)
> 	for (u32 i = 0; i < UNROLL_BATCH; i++)
> 		op(priv, i);
> 
> Note that sometimes the compilers won't unroll loops if they think this
> would have worse optimization and perf than without unrolling, and that
> unroll attributes are available only starting GCC 8. For older compiler
> versions, no hints/attributes will be applied.
> For better unrolling/parallelization, don't have any variables that
> interfere between iterations except for the iterator itself.
> 
> Co-developed-by: Jose E. Marchesi <jose.marchesi@xxxxxxxxxx> # pragmas
> Signed-off-by: Jose E. Marchesi <jose.marchesi@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>

Hi Alexander,

This patch adds four variants of the unrolled helper.  But as far as I can
tell the patch-set only makes use of one of them, unrolled_count().

I think it would be best if this patch only added helpers that are used.

...




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux