Add a simple repro for the issue of miscalculating LDX/STX/ST CO-RE relocation size adjustment when the CO-RE relocation target type is an ARRAY. We need to make sure that compiler generates LDX/STX/ST instruction with CO-RE relocation against entire ARRAY type, not ARRAY's element. With the code pattern in selftest, we get this: 59: 61 71 00 00 00 00 00 00 w1 = *(u32 *)(r7 + 0x0) 00000000000001d8: CO-RE <byte_off> [5] struct core_reloc_arrays::a (0:0) Where offset of `int a[5]` is embedded (through CO-RE relocation) into memory load instruction itself. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx> --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/core_reloc.c | 6 ++++-- ...f__core_reloc_arrays___err_bad_signed_arr_elem_sz.c | 3 +++ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/core_reloc_types.h | 10 ++++++++++ .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_core_reloc_arrays.c | 5 +++++ 4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf__core_reloc_arrays___err_bad_signed_arr_elem_sz.c diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/core_reloc.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/core_reloc.c index e10ea92c3fe2..08963c82f30b 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/core_reloc.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/core_reloc.c @@ -85,11 +85,11 @@ static int duration = 0; #define NESTING_ERR_CASE(name) { \ NESTING_CASE_COMMON(name), \ .fails = true, \ - .run_btfgen_fails = true, \ + .run_btfgen_fails = true, \ } #define ARRAYS_DATA(struct_name) STRUCT_TO_CHAR_PTR(struct_name) { \ - .a = { [2] = 1 }, \ + .a = { [2] = 1, [3] = 11 }, \ .b = { [1] = { [2] = { [3] = 2 } } }, \ .c = { [1] = { .c = 3 } }, \ .d = { [0] = { [0] = { .d = 4 } } }, \ @@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ static int duration = 0; .input_len = sizeof(struct core_reloc_##name), \ .output = STRUCT_TO_CHAR_PTR(core_reloc_arrays_output) { \ .a2 = 1, \ + .a3 = 12, \ .b123 = 2, \ .c1c = 3, \ .d00d = 4, \ @@ -602,6 +603,7 @@ static const struct core_reloc_test_case test_cases[] = { ARRAYS_ERR_CASE(arrays___err_non_array), ARRAYS_ERR_CASE(arrays___err_wrong_val_type), ARRAYS_ERR_CASE(arrays___err_bad_zero_sz_arr), + ARRAYS_ERR_CASE(arrays___err_bad_signed_arr_elem_sz), /* enum/ptr/int handling scenarios */ PRIMITIVES_CASE(primitives), diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf__core_reloc_arrays___err_bad_signed_arr_elem_sz.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf__core_reloc_arrays___err_bad_signed_arr_elem_sz.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..21a560427b10 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf__core_reloc_arrays___err_bad_signed_arr_elem_sz.c @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +#include "core_reloc_types.h" + +void f(struct core_reloc_arrays___err_bad_signed_arr_elem_sz x) {} diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/core_reloc_types.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/core_reloc_types.h index fd8e1b4c6762..5760ae015e09 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/core_reloc_types.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/core_reloc_types.h @@ -347,6 +347,7 @@ struct core_reloc_nesting___err_too_deep { */ struct core_reloc_arrays_output { int a2; + int a3; char b123; int c1c; int d00d; @@ -455,6 +456,15 @@ struct core_reloc_arrays___err_bad_zero_sz_arr { struct core_reloc_arrays_substruct d[1][2]; }; +struct core_reloc_arrays___err_bad_signed_arr_elem_sz { + /* int -> short (signed!): not supported case */ + short a[5]; + char b[2][3][4]; + struct core_reloc_arrays_substruct c[3]; + struct core_reloc_arrays_substruct d[1][2]; + struct core_reloc_arrays_substruct f[][2]; +}; + /* * PRIMITIVES */ diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_core_reloc_arrays.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_core_reloc_arrays.c index 51b3f79df523..448403634eea 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_core_reloc_arrays.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_core_reloc_arrays.c @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ struct { struct core_reloc_arrays_output { int a2; + int a3; char b123; int c1c; int d00d; @@ -41,6 +42,7 @@ int test_core_arrays(void *ctx) { struct core_reloc_arrays *in = (void *)&data.in; struct core_reloc_arrays_output *out = (void *)&data.out; + int *a; if (CORE_READ(&out->a2, &in->a[2])) return 1; @@ -53,6 +55,9 @@ int test_core_arrays(void *ctx) if (CORE_READ(&out->f01c, &in->f[0][1].c)) return 1; + a = __builtin_preserve_access_index(({ in->a; })); + out->a3 = a[0] + a[1] + a[2] + a[3]; + return 0; } -- 2.43.5