Re: [PATCH bpf-next v8 04/12] bpf: stop calling some sock_op BPF CALLs in new timestamping callbacks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 11:26 PM Willem de Bruijn
<willemdebruijn.kernel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Jason Xing wrote:
> > Simply disallow calling bpf_sock_ops_setsockopt/getsockopt,
> > bpf_sock_ops_cb_flags_set, and the bpf_sock_ops_load_hdr_opt for
> > the new timestamping callbacks for the safety consideration.
>
> Please reword this: Disallow .. unless this is operating on a locked
> TCP socket. Or something along those lines.

Will adjust it.

>
> > Besides, In the next round, the UDP proto for SO_TIMESTAMPING bpf
> > extension will be supported, so there should be no safety problem,
> > which is usually caused by UDP socket trying to access TCP fields.
>
> Besides is probably the wrong word here: this is not an aside, but
> the actual reason for this test, if I follow correctly.

Right, will fix it. Thanks.

>
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  net/core/filter.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
> > index dc0e67c5776a..d3395ffe058e 100644
> > --- a/net/core/filter.c
> > +++ b/net/core/filter.c
> > @@ -5523,6 +5523,11 @@ static int __bpf_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
> >       return -EINVAL;
> >  }
> >
> > +static bool is_locked_tcp_sock_ops(struct bpf_sock_ops_kern *bpf_sock)
> > +{
> > +     return bpf_sock->op <= BPF_SOCK_OPS_WRITE_HDR_OPT_CB;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static int _bpf_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
> >                          char *optval, int optlen)
> >  {
> > @@ -5673,6 +5678,9 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_sock_addr_getsockopt_proto = {
> >  BPF_CALL_5(bpf_sock_ops_setsockopt, struct bpf_sock_ops_kern *, bpf_sock,
> >          int, level, int, optname, char *, optval, int, optlen)
> >  {
> > +     if (!is_locked_tcp_sock_ops(bpf_sock))
> > +             return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > +
> >       return _bpf_setsockopt(bpf_sock->sk, level, optname, optval, optlen);
> >  }
> >
> > @@ -5758,6 +5766,9 @@ static int bpf_sock_ops_get_syn(struct bpf_sock_ops_kern *bpf_sock,
> >  BPF_CALL_5(bpf_sock_ops_getsockopt, struct bpf_sock_ops_kern *, bpf_sock,
> >          int, level, int, optname, char *, optval, int, optlen)
> >  {
> > +     if (!is_locked_tcp_sock_ops(bpf_sock))
> > +             return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > +
> >       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INET) && level == SOL_TCP &&
> >           optname >= TCP_BPF_SYN && optname <= TCP_BPF_SYN_MAC) {
> >               int ret, copy_len = 0;
> > @@ -5800,6 +5811,9 @@ BPF_CALL_2(bpf_sock_ops_cb_flags_set, struct bpf_sock_ops_kern *, bpf_sock,
> >       struct sock *sk = bpf_sock->sk;
> >       int val = argval & BPF_SOCK_OPS_ALL_CB_FLAGS;
> >
> > +     if (!is_locked_tcp_sock_ops(bpf_sock))
> > +             return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > +
> >       if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INET) || !sk_fullsock(sk))
> >               return -EINVAL;
> >
> > @@ -7609,6 +7623,9 @@ BPF_CALL_4(bpf_sock_ops_load_hdr_opt, struct bpf_sock_ops_kern *, bpf_sock,
> >       u8 search_kind, search_len, copy_len, magic_len;
> >       int ret;
> >
> > +     if (!is_locked_tcp_sock_ops(bpf_sock))
> > +             return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > +
> >       /* 2 byte is the minimal option len except TCPOPT_NOP and
> >        * TCPOPT_EOL which are useless for the bpf prog to learn
> >        * and this helper disallow loading them also.
> > --
> > 2.43.5
> >
>
>





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux