On 01/22, Shigeru Yoshida wrote:
> The function bpf_test_init() now returns an error if user_size
> (.data_size_in) is less than ETH_HLEN, causing the tests to
> fail. Adjust the data size to ensure it meets the requirement of
> ETH_HLEN.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shigeru Yoshida <syoshida@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_cpumap_attach.c | 4 ++--
> .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_devmap_attach.c | 8 ++++----
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_cpumap_attach.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_cpumap_attach.c
> index c7f74f068e78..df27535995af 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_cpumap_attach.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_cpumap_attach.c
> @@ -52,10 +52,10 @@ static void test_xdp_with_cpumap_helpers(void)
> ASSERT_EQ(info.id, val.bpf_prog.id, "Match program id to cpumap entry prog_id");
>
> /* send a packet to trigger any potential bugs in there */
> - char data[10] = {};
> + char data[ETH_HLEN] = {};
> DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, opts,
> .data_in = &data,
> - .data_size_in = 10,
> + .data_size_in = sizeof(data),
> .flags = BPF_F_TEST_XDP_LIVE_FRAMES,
> .repeat = 1,
> );
We should still keep 10, but change the ASSERT_OK below to expect the
error instead. Looking at the comment above, the purpose of the test
is to exercise that error case.
Same for the other two cases.
