Re: [PATCH] seccomp: passthrough uretprobe systemcall without filtering

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 07:39:25PM -0800, Eyal Birger wrote:
> Alternatively, maybe this syscall implementation should be reverted?

Honestly, that seems the best choice. I don't think any thought was
given to how it would interact with syscall interposers (including
ptrace, strict mode seccomp, etc).

-- 
Kees Cook




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux