On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 11:35 AM +08, Jiayuan Chen wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 11:29:04PM +0800, Jiayuan Chen wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 03:50:22PM +0100, Jakub Sitnicki wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 10:05 PM +08, Jiayuan Chen wrote:
>> > > 'sk->copied_seq' was updated in the tcp_eat_skb() function when the
>> > > action of a BPF program was SK_REDIRECT. For other actions, like SK_PASS,
>> > > +}
>> > > +#endif /* CONFIG_BPF_STREAM_PARSER */
>> > > +
>> > > int tcp_bpf_update_proto(struct sock *sk, struct sk_psock *psock, bool restore)
>> > > {
>> > > int family = sk->sk_family == AF_INET6 ? TCP_BPF_IPV6 : TCP_BPF_IPV4;
>> > > @@ -681,6 +722,12 @@ int tcp_bpf_update_proto(struct sock *sk, struct sk_psock *psock, bool restore)
>> > >
>> > > /* Pairs with lockless read in sk_clone_lock() */
>> > > sock_replace_proto(sk, &tcp_bpf_prots[family][config]);
>> > > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BPF_STREAM_PARSER)
>> > > + if (psock->progs.stream_parser && psock->progs.stream_verdict) {
>> > > + psock->copied_seq = tcp_sk(sk)->copied_seq;
>> > > + psock->read_sock = tcp_bpf_strp_read_sock;
>> >
>> > Just directly set psock->strp.cb.read_sock to tcp_bpf_strp_read_sock.
>> > Then we don't need this intermediate psock->read_sock callback, which
>> > doesn't do anything useful.
>> >
>> Ok, I will do this.
>> (BTW, I intended to avoid bringing "struct strparser" into tcp_bpf.c so I
>> added a wrapper function instead in skmsg.c without calling it directly)
>>
> I find that tcp_bpf_update_proto is called before sk_psock_init_strp. Any
> assignment of psock->cb.strp will be overwritten in sk_psock_init_strp.
Or just don't set ->read_sock in strp_init.
It's being reset only because you made it so in patch 1 :-)
