Re: [PATCH net-next v5 03/15] bpf: introduce timestamp_used to allow UDP socket fetched in bpf prog

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/15/25 5:12 PM, Jason Xing wrote:
Also, I need to set allow_direct_access to one as long as there is
"sock_ops.is_fullsock = 1;" in the existing callbacks.
Only set allow_direct_access when the sk is fullsock in the "existing" sockops
callback.
Only "existing"? Then how can the bpf program access those members of
the tcp socket structure in the current/new timestamping callbacks?

There is at least one sk write:

	case offsetof(struct bpf_sock_ops, sk_txhash):
		SOCK_OPS_GET_OR_SET_FIELD(sk_txhash, sk_txhash,
					 struct sock, type);

afaict, the kernel always writes sk->sk_txhash with the sk lock held. The new timestamping callbacks cannot write because it does not hold the lock. Otherwise, it needs another flag in bpf_sock_ops_kern to say read only or not. imo, it is too complicated to be worth it.

It is fine for the new timestamping callbacks not able to access the tcp_sock fields through the bpf_sock_ops. We are not losing anything. The accessible tcp_sock fields through the bpf_sock_ops is limited and the bpf_sock_ops api is pretty much frozen. The bpf prog should use the bpf_core_cast(skops->sk, struct tcp_sock). The future UDP timestamping support will likely need to use the bpf_core_cast anyway because we are not extending "struct bpf_sock_ops" for the udp_sock specific fields.






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux