Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf: use attach_btf instead of vmlinux in bpf_sk_storage_tracing_allowed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf: use attach_btf instead of vmlinux in bpf_sk_storage_tracing_allowed
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 16:37:49 -0800
Cc: bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx, kuba@xxxxxxxxxx, pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx, horms@xxxxxxxxxx, martin.lau@xxxxxxxxxx, ast@xxxxxxxxxx, johannes.berg@xxxxxxxxx, kafai@xxxxxx, songliubraving@xxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Z4qIjSMgIOqbHoef@jkangas-thinkpadp1gen3.rmtuswa.csb>

On 1/17/25 8:42 AM, Jared Kangas wrote:

Good to know, that simplifies the patch quite a bit. Should I add a
Suggested-by when resubmitting?


sgtm. Thanks.

References:
- [PATCH bpf] bpf: use attach_btf instead of vmlinux in bpf_sk_storage_tracing_allowed
  - From: Jared Kangas
- Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf: use attach_btf instead of vmlinux in bpf_sk_storage_tracing_allowed
  - From: Martin KaFai Lau
- Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf: use attach_btf instead of vmlinux in bpf_sk_storage_tracing_allowed
  - From: Jared Kangas

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 5/5] bpf/selftests: add selftest for bpf_smc_ops
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 08/15] net-timestamp: support sw SCM_TSTAMP_SND for bpf extension
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf: use attach_btf instead of vmlinux in bpf_sk_storage_tracing_allowed
Next by thread: [net-next PATCH v4 0/6] Add af_xdp support for cn10k
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Samsung SoC] [Linux Rockchip SoC] [Linux Actions SoC] [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux