Re: [PATCH bpf 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add test based on port range for BPF flow dissector

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add test based on port range for BPF flow dissector
From: Petar Penkov <ppenkov.kernel@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 09:42:11 -0800
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@xxxxxx>, Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>, Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx>, Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@xxxxxx>, Networking <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, bpf <bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20200116085133.392205-3-komachi.yoshiki@gmail.com>

On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 1:13 AM Yoshiki Komachi
<komachi.yoshiki@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Add a simple test to make sure that a filter based on specified port
> range classifies packets correctly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yoshiki Komachi <komachi.yoshiki@xxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Petar Penkov <ppenkov@xxxxxxxxxx>

References:
- [PATCH bpf 0/2] Fix the classification based on port ranges in bpf hook
  - From: Yoshiki Komachi
- [PATCH bpf 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add test based on port range for BPF flow dissector
  - From: Yoshiki Komachi

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH bpf 1/2] flow_dissector: Fix to use new variables for port ranges in bpf hook
Next by Date: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: fix test_progs send_signal flakiness with nmi mode
Previous by thread: [PATCH bpf 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add test based on port range for BPF flow dissector
Next by thread: [PATCH bpf-next v3 00/11] tools: Use consistent libbpf include paths everywhere
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Samsung SoC] [Linux Rockchip SoC] [Linux Actions SoC] [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux