Re: [PATCH bpf v2 4/4] selftests/bpf: Add distilled BTF test about marking BTF_IS_EMBEDDED

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 2025/1/17 7:34, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 2:00 AM Pu Lehui <pulehui@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Pu Lehui <pulehui@xxxxxxxxxx>

When redirecting the split BTF to the vmlinux base BTF, we need to mark
the distilled base struct/union members of split BTF structs/unions in
id_map with BTF_IS_EMBEDDED. This indicates that these types must match
both name and size later. So if a needed composite type, which is the
member of composite type in the split BTF, has a different size in the
base BTF we wish to relocate with, btf__relocate() should error out.

Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
v2: Add test about marking BTF_IS_EMBEDDED.

  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_distill.c    | 72 +++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 72 insertions(+)


Nice test, thanks! Applied the series to bpf-next.

Curious, resilient split BTF is currently supported, shall we deprecate MODULE_ALLOW_BTF_MISMATCH?


diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_distill.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_distill.c
index b72b966df77b..fb67ae195a73 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_distill.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_distill.c
@@ -601,6 +601,76 @@ static void test_distilled_endianness(void)
         btf__free(base);
  }


[...]





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux