Re: [PATCH] fgraph: Move trace_clock_local() for return time to function_graph tracer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 14 Jan 2025 10:18:06 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > I'd rather just nuke the calltime and rettime from struct ftrace_graph_ret.  
> 
> Yeah, this one is good to me. But this will make a slightly different time
> for the same function when we enable multiple function graph tracer on
> different instances (mine records it once and reuse it but this will record
> on each instance). We may need to notice it on the document. :)

And I believe it's separate for each instance now anyway, so I was going to
send this to Linus as well:

diff --git a/Documentation/trace/ftrace.rst b/Documentation/trace/ftrace.rst
index 272464bb7c60..2b74f96d09d5 100644
--- a/Documentation/trace/ftrace.rst
+++ b/Documentation/trace/ftrace.rst
@@ -810,6 +810,12 @@ Here is the list of current tracers that may be configured.
 	to draw a graph of function calls similar to C code
 	source.
 
+	Note that the function graph calculates the timings of when the
+	function starts and returns internally and for each instance. If
+	there are two instances that run function graph tracer and traces
+	the same functions, the length of the timings may be slightly off as
+	each read the timestamp separately and not at the same time.
+
   "blk"
 
 	The block tracer. The tracer used by the blktrace user


> 
> Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks,

-- Steve





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux