On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 12:34:46PM +0530, Athira Rajeev wrote: > > > > On 10 Jan 2025, at 2:44 AM, Charlie Jenkins <charlie@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 05:49:39PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 11:48:36AM -0800, Charlie Jenkins wrote: > >>> On Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 12:59:43PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > >>>> ⬢ [acme@toolbox perf-tools-next]$ git log --oneline -1 ; time make -C tools/perf build-test > >>>> d06826160a982494 (HEAD -> perf-tools-next) perf tools: Remove dependency on libaudit > >>>> make: Entering directory '/home/acme/git/perf-tools-next/tools/perf' > >>>> - tarpkg: ./tests/perf-targz-src-pkg . > >>>> make_static: cd . && make LDFLAGS=-static NO_PERF_READ_VDSO32=1 NO_PERF_READ_VDSOX32=1 NO_JVMTI=1 NO_LIBTRACEEVENT=1 NO_LIBELF=1 -j28 DESTDIR=/tmp/tmp.JJT3tvN7bV > >>>> make_with_gtk2: cd . && make GTK2=1 -j28 DESTDIR=/tmp/tmp.BF53V2qpl3 > >>>> - /home/acme/git/perf-tools-next/tools/perf/BUILD_TEST_FEATURE_DUMP: cd . && make FEATURE_DUMP_COPY=/home/acme/git/perf-tools-next/tools/perf/BUILD_TEST_FEATURE_DUMP feature-dump > >>>> cd . && make FEATURE_DUMP_COPY=/home/acme/git/perf-tools-next/tools/perf/BUILD_TEST_FEATURE_DUMP feature-dump > >>>> make_no_libbionic_O: cd . && make NO_LIBBIONIC=1 FEATURES_DUMP=/home/acme/git/perf-tools-next/tools/perf/BUILD_TEST_FEATURE_DUMP -j28 O=/tmp/tmp.KZuQ0q2Vs6 DESTDIR=/tmp/tmp.0sxMyH91gS > >>>> make_util_map_o_O: cd . && make util/map.o FEATURES_DUMP=/home/acme/git/perf-tools-next/tools/perf/BUILD_TEST_FEATURE_DUMP -j28 O=/tmp/tmp.Y0Mx3KLREI DESTDIR=/tmp/tmp.wg9HCVVLHE > >>>> make_install_O: cd . && make install FEATURES_DUMP=/home/acme/git/perf-tools-next/tools/perf/BUILD_TEST_FEATURE_DUMP -j28 O=/tmp/tmp.P0LEBAkW1X DESTDIR=/tmp/tmp.agTavZndFN > >>>> failed to find: etc/bash_completion.d/perf > >>> > >>> Is this something introduced by this patch? > >> > >> I don't think so. > >> > >> BTW this series is already pushed out to perf-tools-next: > >> > >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perf/perf-tools-next.git/log/?h=perf-tools-next > >> > >> Thanks! > >> > >> - Arnaldo > > > > Thank you! > > > > - Charlie > > Hi Charlie, Arnaldo > > While testing the series, I hit compilation issue in powerpc > > Snippet of logs: Yeah, Stephen Rothwell noticed it in linux next and Charlie provided a fix, so I squashed it all together and will push it soon: Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250108-perf_syscalltbl-v6-14-7543b5293098@xxxxxxxxxxxx Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250110100505.78d81450@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [ Stephen Rothwell noticed on linux-next that the powerpc build for perf was broken and ...] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250109-perf_powerpc_spu-v1-1-c097fc43737e@xxxxxxxxxxxx [ ... Charlie fixed it up and asked for it to be squashed to avoid breaking bisection. o Thanks for the report! - Arnaldo
