On 1/7/25 4:29 PM, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> @@ -623,21 +622,21 @@ static gro_result_t napi_skb_finish(struct napi_struct *napi,
> return ret;
> }
>
> -gro_result_t napi_gro_receive(struct napi_struct *napi, struct sk_buff *skb)
> +gro_result_t gro_receive_skb(struct gro_node *gro, struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> gro_result_t ret;
>
> - skb_mark_napi_id(skb, napi);
> + __skb_mark_napi_id(skb, gro->napi_id);
Is this the only place where gro->napi_id is needed? If so, what about
moving skb_mark_napi_id() in napi_gro_receive() and remove such field?
/P
