Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 08/22] rqspinlock: Protect pending bit owners from stalls

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 at 07:49, Waiman Long <llong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 1/7/25 8:59 AM, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi wrote:
> > The pending bit is used to avoid queueing in case the lock is
> > uncontended, and has demonstrated benefits for the 2 contender scenario,
> > esp. on x86. In case the pending bit is acquired and we wait for the
> > locked bit to disappear, we may get stuck due to the lock owner not
> > making progress. Hence, this waiting loop must be protected with a
> > timeout check.
> >
> > To perform a graceful recovery once we decide to abort our lock
> > acquisition attempt in this case, we must unset the pending bit since we
> > own it. All waiters undoing their changes and exiting gracefully allows
> > the lock word to be restored to the unlocked state once all participants
> > (owner, waiters) have been recovered, and the lock remains usable.
> > Hence, set the pending bit back to zero before returning to the caller.
> >
> > Introduce a lockevent (rqspinlock_lock_timeout) to capture timeout
> > event statistics.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Barret Rhoden <brho@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   include/asm-generic/rqspinlock.h  |  2 +-
> >   kernel/locking/lock_events_list.h |  5 +++++
> >   kernel/locking/rqspinlock.c       | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> >   3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/asm-generic/rqspinlock.h b/include/asm-generic/rqspinlock.h
> > index 8ed266f4e70b..5c996a82e75f 100644
> > --- a/include/asm-generic/rqspinlock.h
> > +++ b/include/asm-generic/rqspinlock.h
> > @@ -19,6 +19,6 @@ struct qspinlock;
> >    */
> >   #define RES_DEF_TIMEOUT (NSEC_PER_SEC / 2)
> >
> > -extern void resilient_queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val, u64 timeout);
> > +extern int resilient_queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val, u64 timeout);
> >
> >   #endif /* __ASM_GENERIC_RQSPINLOCK_H */
> > diff --git a/kernel/locking/lock_events_list.h b/kernel/locking/lock_events_list.h
> > index 97fb6f3f840a..c5286249994d 100644
> > --- a/kernel/locking/lock_events_list.h
> > +++ b/kernel/locking/lock_events_list.h
> > @@ -49,6 +49,11 @@ LOCK_EVENT(lock_use_node4) /* # of locking ops that use 4th percpu node */
> >   LOCK_EVENT(lock_no_node)    /* # of locking ops w/o using percpu node    */
> >   #endif /* CONFIG_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS */
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Locking events for Resilient Queued Spin Lock
> > + */
> > +LOCK_EVENT(rqspinlock_lock_timeout)  /* # of locking ops that timeout        */
> > +
> >   /*
> >    * Locking events for rwsem
> >    */
>
> Since the build of rqspinlock.c is conditional on
> CONFIG_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS, this lock event should be inside the
> CONFIG_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS block.

Ack, I will fix this.

>
> Cheers,
> Longman
>
>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux