On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 at 20:20, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 05:59:49AM -0800, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi wrote:
> > +struct rqspinlock_timeout {
> > + u64 timeout_end;
> > + u64 duration;
> > + u16 spin;
> > +};
>
> > +#define RES_CHECK_TIMEOUT(ts, ret) \
> > + ({ \
> > + if (!((ts).spin++ & 0xffff)) \
>
> Per the above spin is a u16, this mask is pointless.
Ack, I will drop the redundant mask.
>
> > + (ret) = check_timeout(&(ts)); \
> > + (ret); \
> > + })
