Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] expose number of map entries to userspace

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



(sorry for double posting, this time in plain text)
Thanks a lot for the feedback!

So, to double check, the suggestion is to only extend the libbpf API
with a new helper that does pretty much what get_cur_elements() does
in tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/map_percpu_stats.c ?

> On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 at 08:44, Anton Protopopov <aspsk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On 25/01/06 05:19PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>> > On 1/6/25 3:53 PM, Charalampos Stylianopoulos wrote:
>> > > This patch series provides an easy way for userspace applications to
>> > > query the number of entries currently present in a map.
>> > >
>> > > Currently, the number of entries in a map is accessible only from kernel space
>> > > and eBPF programs. A userspace program that wants to track map utilization has to
>> > > create and attach an eBPF program solely for that purpose.
>> > >
>> > > This series makes the number of entries in a map easily accessible, by extending the
>> > > main bpf syscall with a new command. The command supports only maps that already
>> > > track utilization, namely hash maps, LPM maps and queue/stack maps.
>> >
>> > An earlier attempt to directly expose it to user space can be found here [0], which
>> > eventually led to [1] to only expose it via kfunc for BPF programs in order to avoid
>> > extending UAPI.
>> >
>> > Perhaps instead add a small libbpf helper (e.g. bpf_map__current_entries to complement
>> > bpf_map__max_entries) which does all the work to extract that info via [1] underneath?
>>
>> One small thingy here is that bpf_map_sum_elem_count() is only
>> available from the map iterator. Which means that to get the
>> bpf_map_sum_elem_count() for one map only, one have to iterate
>> through the whole set of maps (and filter out all but one).
>>
>> I wanted to follow up my series by either adding the result of
>> calling bpf_map_sum_elem_count() to map_info as u32 or to add
>> possibility to provide a map_fd/map_id when creating an iterator
>> (so that it is only called for one map). But so far I haven't
>> a real use case for getting the number of elements for one map only.
>>
>> > Thanks,
>> > Daniel
>> >
>> >   [0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230531110511.64612-1-aspsk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>> >   [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230705160139.19967-1-aspsk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>> >       https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230719092952.41202-1-aspsk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>> >
>> > > Charalampos Stylianopoulos (4):
>> > >    bpf: Add map_num_entries map op
>> > >    bpf: Add bpf command to get number of map entries
>> > >    libbpf: Add support for MAP_GET_NUM_ENTRIES command
>> > >    selftests/bpf: Add tests for bpf_map_get_num_entries
>> > >
>> > >   include/linux/bpf.h                           |  3 ++
>> > >   include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h             |  1 +
>> > >   include/uapi/linux/bpf.h                      | 17 +++++++++
>> > >   kernel/bpf/devmap.c                           | 14 ++++++++
>> > >   kernel/bpf/hashtab.c                          | 10 ++++++
>> > >   kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c                         |  8 +++++
>> > >   kernel/bpf/queue_stack_maps.c                 | 11 +++++-
>> > >   kernel/bpf/syscall.c                          | 32 +++++++++++++++++
>> > >   tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h                | 17 +++++++++
>> > >   tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c                           | 16 +++++++++
>> > >   tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h                           |  2 ++
>> > >   tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map                      |  1 +
>> > >   .../bpf/map_tests/lpm_trie_map_basic_ops.c    |  5 +++
>> > >   tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c       | 35 +++++++++++++++++++
>> > >   14 files changed, 171 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> > >
>> >




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux