Re: [PATCH v2] selftests/bpf: workarounds for GCC BPF build

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday, January 6th, 2025 at 11:21 AM, Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@xxxxx> wrote:

> 
> [...]
> 
> 
> I was wondering how clang handles this, and it turns out
> -fno-strict-aliasing is true by default in clang [1]:
> 
> -fno-strict-aliasing Disable optimizations based on strict aliasing rules (default)
> 
> [1]: https://clang.llvm.org/docs/UsersManual.html

Whoops, that's about clang-cl, sorry.

Assuming clang does check for aliases, I guess it means clang just
doesn't detect these violations.

> 
> > > # Some utility functions use LLVM libraries
> > > jit_disasm_helpers.c-CFLAGS = $(LLVM_CFLAGS)
> > > 
> > > @@ -507,7 +511,7 @@ endef
> > > # Build BPF object using GCC
> > > define GCC_BPF_BUILD_RULE
> > > $(call msg,GCC-BPF,$4,$2)
> > > - $(Q)$(BPF_GCC) $3 -DBPF_NO_PRESERVE_ACCESS_INDEX -Wno-attributes -O2 -c $1 -o $2
> > > + $(Q)$(BPF_GCC) $3 -DBPF_NO_PRESERVE_ACCESS_INDEX -Wno-attributes -O2 -std=gnu17 -c $1 -o $2
> > > endef
> > > 
> > > SKEL_BLACKLIST := btf__% test_pinning_invalid.c test_sk_assign.c





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux