Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/2] xdp: Introduce bulking for non-map XDP_REDIRECT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 10:11 AM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Since commit 96360004b862 ("xdp: Make devmap flush_list common for all map
> > instances"), devmap flushing is a global operation instead of tied to a
> > particular map. This means that with a bit of refactoring, we can finally fix
> > the performance delta between the bpf_redirect_map() and bpf_redirect() helper
> > functions, by introducing bulking for the latter as well.
> >
> > This series makes this change by moving the data structure used for the bulking
> > into struct net_device itself, so we can access it even when there is not
> > devmap. Once this is done, moving the bpf_redirect() helper to use the bulking
> > mechanism becomes quite trivial, and brings bpf_redirect() up to the same as
> > bpf_redirect_map():
> >
> >                        Before:   After:
> > 1 CPU:
> > bpf_redirect_map:      8.4 Mpps  8.4 Mpps  (no change)
> > bpf_redirect:          5.0 Mpps  8.4 Mpps  (+68%)
> > 2 CPUs:
> > bpf_redirect_map:     15.9 Mpps  16.1 Mpps  (+1% or ~no change)
> > bpf_redirect:          9.5 Mpps  15.9 Mpps  (+67%)
> >
> > After this patch series, the only semantics different between the two variants
> > of the bpf() helper (apart from the absence of a map argument, obviously) is
> > that the _map() variant will return an error if passed an invalid map index,
> > whereas the bpf_redirect() helper will succeed, but drop packets on
> > xdp_do_redirect(). This is because the helper has no reference to the calling
> > netdev, so unfortunately we can't do the ifindex lookup directly in the helper.
> >
> > Changelog:
> >
> > v2:
> >   - Consolidate code paths and tracepoints for map and non-map redirect variants
> >     (Björn)
> >   - Add performance data for 2-CPU test (Jesper)
> >   - Move fields to avoid shifting cache lines in struct net_device (Eric)
> 
> John, since you commented on v1 please review this v2. Thanks!

hmm don't think I had an initial comment but will review regardless ;)



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux