Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 5/5] bpf/selftests: add selftest for bpf_smc_ops

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 02:59:15PM -0800, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> On 12/17/24 6:44 PM, D. Wythe wrote:
> >+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> >+
> >+#include "vmlinux.h"
> >+
> >+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
> >+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
> >+#include "bpf_tracing_net.h"
> >+
> >+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
> >+
> >+struct smc_sock {
> 
> I suspect this should be "smc_sock___local". Otherwise, it can't
> compile if the same type is found in vmlinux.h.
> 

Yes, it has been changed to ___local.

> I only looked at the high level of prog_tests/test_bpf_smc.c. A few comments,
> 
> Try to reuse the helpers in network_helpers.c and test_progs.c, e.g.
> netns creation helpers, start_server, ...etc. There are many
> examples in selftests/bpf/prog_tests using them.
> 
> I see 1s timeout everywhere. BPF CI could be slow some time. Please
> consider how reliable the multi-thread test is. If the test is too
> flaky, it will be put in the selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.
> 

Got it, I will remove those timeouts in the next version. I have tried
reusing these helpers, it is very convenient and makes code more
concise!

D. Wythe

> >+	struct sock sk;
> >+	struct smc_sock *listen_smc;
> >+	bool use_fallback;
> >+} __attribute__((preserve_access_index));
> >+




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux