From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@xxxxxxxxxx>
There is a UAF report in the bpf_struct_ops when CONFIG_MODULES=n.
In particular, the report is on tcp_congestion_ops that has
a "struct module *owner" member.
For struct_ops that has a "struct module *owner" member,
it can be extended either by the regular kernel module or
by the bpf_struct_ops. bpf_try_module_get() will be used
to do the refcounting and different refcount is done
based on the owner pointer. When CONFIG_MODULES=n,
the btf_id of the "struct module" is missing:
WARN: resolve_btfids: unresolved symbol module
Thus, the bpf_try_module_get() cannot do the correct refcounting.
Not all subsystem's struct_ops requires the "struct module *owner" member.
e.g. the recent sched_ext_ops.
This patch is to disable bpf_struct_ops registration if
the struct_ops has the "struct module *" member and the
"struct module" btf_id is missing. The btf_type_is_fwd() helper
is moved to the btf.h header file for this test.
This has happened since the beginning of bpf_struct_ops which has gone
through many changes. The Fixes tag is set to a recent commit that this
patch can apply cleanly. Considering CONFIG_MODULES=n is not
common and the age of the issue, targeting for bpf-next also.
Fixes: 1611603537a4 ("bpf: Create argument information for nullable arguments.")
Reported-by: Robert Morris <rtm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/74665.1733669976@localhost/
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/btf.h | 5 +++++
kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/bpf/btf.c | 5 -----
3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/btf.h b/include/linux/btf.h
index 4214e76c9168..2a08a2b55592 100644
--- a/include/linux/btf.h
+++ b/include/linux/btf.h
@@ -353,6 +353,11 @@ static inline bool btf_type_is_scalar(const struct btf_type *t)
return btf_type_is_int(t) || btf_type_is_enum(t);
}
+static inline bool btf_type_is_fwd(const struct btf_type *t)
+{
+ return BTF_INFO_KIND(t->info) == BTF_KIND_FWD;
+}
+
static inline bool btf_type_is_typedef(const struct btf_type *t)
{
return BTF_INFO_KIND(t->info) == BTF_KIND_TYPEDEF;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
index 606efe32485a..040fb1cd840b 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
@@ -310,6 +310,20 @@ void bpf_struct_ops_desc_release(struct bpf_struct_ops_desc *st_ops_desc)
kfree(arg_info);
}
+static bool is_module_member(const struct btf *btf, u32 id)
+{
+ const struct btf_type *t;
+
+ t = btf_type_resolve_ptr(btf, id, NULL);
+ if (!t)
+ return false;
+
+ if (!__btf_type_is_struct(t) && !btf_type_is_fwd(t))
+ return false;
+
+ return !strcmp(btf_name_by_offset(btf, t->name_off), "module");
+}
+
int bpf_struct_ops_desc_init(struct bpf_struct_ops_desc *st_ops_desc,
struct btf *btf,
struct bpf_verifier_log *log)
@@ -389,6 +403,13 @@ int bpf_struct_ops_desc_init(struct bpf_struct_ops_desc *st_ops_desc,
goto errout;
}
+ if (!st_ops_ids[IDX_MODULE_ID] && is_module_member(btf, member->type)) {
+ pr_warn("'struct module' btf id not found. Is CONFIG_MODULES enabled? bpf_struct_ops '%s' needs module support.\n",
+ st_ops->name);
+ err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ goto errout;
+ }
+
func_proto = btf_type_resolve_func_ptr(btf,
member->type,
NULL);
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
index 28246c59e12e..8396ce1d0fba 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
@@ -498,11 +498,6 @@ bool btf_type_is_void(const struct btf_type *t)
return t == &btf_void;
}
-static bool btf_type_is_fwd(const struct btf_type *t)
-{
- return BTF_INFO_KIND(t->info) == BTF_KIND_FWD;
-}
-
static bool btf_type_is_datasec(const struct btf_type *t)
{
return BTF_INFO_KIND(t->info) == BTF_KIND_DATASEC;
--
2.43.5
