On 12/20/24 3:23 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 18:39:26 +0100 Daniel Borkmann wrote:+ if (headroom) { + peer->needed_headroom = headroom; + dev->needed_headroom = headroom; + } + if (tailroom) { + peer->needed_tailroom = tailroom; + dev->needed_tailroom = tailroom; + }Since you use the same one for main dev and peer should there be something rejecting the use of the new attr in the peer attrs? (IFLA_NETKIT_PEER_INFO)
The peer info is parsed via rtnl_nla_parse_ifinfomsg() which internally uses ifla_policy filter where IFLA_INFO_DATA is not part of, but to be sure I can add one more selftest case to confirm.
+ struct {static const?
Ack, will change. Thanks, Daniel
