Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 03/13] bpf: Allow struct_ops prog to return referenced kptr

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/13/24 3:29 PM, Amery Hung wrote:
@@ -15993,13 +16001,15 @@ static int check_return_code(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno, const char
  	const char *exit_ctx = "At program exit";
  	struct tnum enforce_attach_type_range = tnum_unknown;
  	const struct bpf_prog *prog = env->prog;
-	struct bpf_reg_state *reg;
+	struct bpf_reg_state *reg = reg_state(env, regno);
  	struct bpf_retval_range range = retval_range(0, 1);
  	enum bpf_prog_type prog_type = resolve_prog_type(env->prog);
  	int err;
  	struct bpf_func_state *frame = env->cur_state->frame[0];
  	const bool is_subprog = frame->subprogno;
  	bool return_32bit = false;
+	struct btf *btf = bpf_prog_get_target_btf(prog);
+	const struct btf_type *ret_type = NULL;
/* LSM and struct_ops func-ptr's return type could be "void" */
  	if (!is_subprog || frame->in_exception_callback_fn) {
@@ -16008,10 +16018,31 @@ static int check_return_code(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno, const char
  			if (prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_LSM_CGROUP)
  				/* See below, can be 0 or 0-1 depending on hook. */
  				break;
-			fallthrough;
+			if (!prog->aux->attach_func_proto->type)
+				return 0;
+			break;
  		case BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS:
  			if (!prog->aux->attach_func_proto->type)
  				return 0;
+
+			if (frame->in_exception_callback_fn)
+				break;
+
+			/* Allow a struct_ops program to return a referenced kptr if it
+			 * matches the operator's return type and is in its unmodified
+			 * form. A scalar zero (i.e., a null pointer) is also allowed.
+			 */
+			ret_type = btf_type_by_id(btf, prog->aux->attach_func_proto->type);
+			if (btf_type_is_ptr(ret_type) && reg->type & PTR_TO_BTF_ID &&

The "reg->type & PTR_TO_BTF_ID" does not look right. It should be "base_type(reg->type) == PTR_TO_BTF_ID".

+			    reg->ref_obj_id) {
+				if (reg->btf_id != ret_type->type) {

reg->btf could be a bpf prog's btf (i.e. prog->aux->btf) instead of the kernel btf, so only comparing btf_id here is not very correct.

One way could be to first compare the reg->btf == prog->aux->attach_btf.
prog->aux->attach_btf here must be a kernel btf.

Another way is, btf_type_resolve_ptr() should be a better helper than btf_type_by_id() here. It only returns non NULL if the type is a pointer and also skips the modifiers like "const" before returning. Then it can directly compare the "struct btf_type *" returned by 'btf_type_resolve_ptr(prog->aux->attach_btf, prog->aux->attach_func_proto->type, NULL)' and 'btf_type_resolve_ptr(reg->btf, reg->btf_id, NULL)'

May as well enforce the pointer returned by an "ops" must be a struct (i.e. __btf_type_is_struct(t) == true). This enforcement can be done in bpf_struct_ops_desc_init().



+					verbose(env, "Return kptr type, struct %s, doesn't match function prototype, struct %s\n",
+						btf_type_name(reg->btf, reg->btf_id),
+						btf_type_name(btf, ret_type->type));
+					return -EINVAL;
+				}
+				return __check_ptr_off_reg(env, reg, regno, false);
+			}
  			break;
  		default:
  			break;
@@ -16033,8 +16064,6 @@ static int check_return_code(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno, const char
  		return -EACCES;
  	}
- reg = cur_regs(env) + regno;
-
  	if (frame->in_async_callback_fn) {
  		/* enforce return zero from async callbacks like timer */
  		exit_ctx = "At async callback return";
@@ -16133,6 +16162,11 @@ static int check_return_code(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno, const char
  	case BPF_PROG_TYPE_NETFILTER:
  		range = retval_range(NF_DROP, NF_ACCEPT);
  		break;
+	case BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS:
+		if (!ret_type || !btf_type_is_ptr(ret_type))
+			return 0;
+		range = retval_range(0, 0);
+		break;
  	case BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT:
  		/* freplace program can return anything as its return value
  		 * depends on the to-be-replaced kernel func or bpf program.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux