Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/6] mm, bpf: Introduce free_pages_nolock()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 11:25 PM Alexei Starovoitov
<alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 10:49 PM Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 10:37 PM Alexei Starovoitov
> > <alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 9:58 PM Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > What I mean is, functions like __free_unref_page() and
> > > > free_unref_page_commit() now accept fpi_flags, but any flags other
> > > > than FPI_TRYLOCK are essentially ignored, also not very clear.
> > >
> > > They're not ignored. They are just not useful in this context.
> >
> > I think they are. For example, if you pass FPI_SKIP_REPORT_NOTIFY to
> > __free_unref_page(), page_reporting_notify_free() will still be called
> > when the page is eventually freed to the buddy allocator. Same goes
> > for FPI_NO_TAIL.
>
> free_pcppages_bulk()->page_reporting_notify_free() will _not_ be called
> when FPI_TRYLOCK is specified.
> They are internal flags. The callers cannot make try_alloc_pages()
> pass these extra flags.
> The flags are more or less exclusive.
>
> > > The code rules over comment. If you have a concrete suggestion on
> > > how to improve the comment please say so.
> >
> > What I had in mind is adding a WARN in the pcp freeing functions if
> > any FPI flag but FPI_TRYLOCK is passed, and/or explicitly calling out
> > that other flags should not be passed as they have no effect in this
> > context (whether at the function definition, above the WARN, or at the
> > flag definitions).
>
> pcp freeing functions?
> In particular?
> tbh this sounds like defensive programming...
> BUILD_BUG_ON is a good thing when api is misused,
> but WARN will be wasting run-time cycles on something that should
> have been caught during code review.
> free_unref_page_commit() is a shallow function when FPI_TRYLOCK is used.
> There is no need to propagate fpi_flags further into free_pcppages_bulk
> just to issue a WARN.

I meant WARN in free_unref_page_commit() if any other FPI flags are
used. Anyway, I don't feel strongly about this as I mentioned earlier.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux